Dreyfus affair
The Dreyfus Affair was one of the most significant political and social scandals in French history, occurring from 1894 to…
The Dreyfus Affair was one of the most significant political and social scandals in French history, occurring from 1894 to 1906. It centered around the wrongful conviction of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French army, for treason. The affair exposed deep divisions in French society, particularly over issues of anti-Semitism, military authority, and the role of the press and justice system. It had far-reaching consequences, influencing politics, public opinion, and the future of France as a republic.
Background
France in the Late 19th Century:
Political and Social Tensions: In the late 19th century, France was a deeply divided society. The country had undergone a series of revolutions, wars, and political changes, leading to the establishment of the Third Republic in 1870. However, the republic was fragile, with monarchists, conservatives, and republicans vying for power. The French army, which had suffered a humiliating defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871), was eager to restore its honor and prestige.
Anti-Semitism in France: Anti-Semitism was widespread in Europe at the time, and France was no exception. The rise of nationalist and conservative movements in France, combined with the influence of the Catholic Church, fostered suspicion and hostility toward Jews. Many saw Jews as outsiders who could not be fully trusted, particularly in the army and government.
The Accusation and Trial of Alfred Dreyfus
The Arrest and Conviction (1894):
The Case Against Dreyfus: In 1894, French military intelligence discovered a document (referred to as the bordereau) in the wastebasket of the German Embassy in Paris. The document indicated that someone in the French army was passing military secrets to the Germans. Suspicion quickly fell on Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the artillery corps. Dreyfus came under suspicion partly because of his Jewish background and his relatively recent rise to the officer class, which aroused jealousy and suspicion among his colleagues.
The Trial and Conviction: Dreyfus was arrested in October 1894 and charged with treason. The evidence against him was weak, consisting mainly of handwriting analysis of the bordereau and vague suspicions about his loyalty. Nonetheless, in a secret military trial in December 1894, Dreyfus was convicted of treason and sentenced to life imprisonment on Devil’s Island, a remote and brutal penal colony off the coast of French Guiana. His conviction was largely based on false evidence and anti-Semitic prejudice.
Public Humiliation: On January 5, 1895, Dreyfus was subjected to a public degradation ceremony in the courtyard of the École Militaire in Paris, where his military insignia were torn off, and his sword was broken. He repeatedly proclaimed his innocence during the ceremony, but the public and much of the media accepted his guilt, largely due to the anti-Semitic sentiments of the time.
The Affair Unfolds: Evidence of a Miscarriage of Justice
The Role of Georges Picquart and the Discovery of New Evidence:
Colonel Georges Picquart’s Investigation: In 1896, Georges Picquart, the new head of French military intelligence, uncovered evidence that cast doubt on Dreyfus’s guilt. Picquart discovered that the real culprit was likely Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy, a French major with a history of financial troubles and dubious loyalties. Picquart found that the handwriting on the bordereau more closely matched Esterhazy’s than Dreyfus’s.
Military Cover-up: Despite this evidence, Picquart’s superiors in the military were unwilling to reopen the Dreyfus case, fearing that doing so would damage the army’s reputation. Instead, Picquart was transferred to a remote post in Tunisia to silence him. The military then worked to suppress evidence that might exonerate Dreyfus and continued to maintain Dreyfus’s guilt.
Public Outcry and Intellectual Support
Emile Zola’s “J’Accuse”: The Dreyfus Affair began to attract widespread public attention when novelist Émile Zola published an open letter titled “J’Accuse” on January 13, 1898, in the newspaper L’Aurore. In his letter, Zola accused the French government and military of a gross miscarriage of justice, corruption, and anti-Semitism. He named senior army officers and government officials who had covered up the truth and deliberately condemned an innocent man. Zola’s letter galvanized public opinion and became a turning point in the affair.
Dreyfusards vs. Anti-Dreyfusards: The Dreyfus Affair split French society into two camps: the Dreyfusards, who believed in Dreyfus’s innocence and fought for his exoneration, and the Anti-Dreyfusards, who believed in his guilt and supported the military’s authority. Dreyfusards were typically republicans, liberals, and intellectuals, while Anti-Dreyfusards were often conservatives, monarchists, and members of the Catholic Church, which viewed the affair as a defense of traditional values.
Trials and Revisions
The Trial of Ferdinand Esterhazy (1898):
Esterhazy’s Acquittal: In response to growing public pressure, Major Esterhazy was brought to trial in January 1898. However, in a highly politicized and biased military court, Esterhazy was acquitted of all charges after only two days of deliberation. The acquittal outraged Dreyfus supporters and deepened the divide between the two camps.
The Dreyfus Case Reopened
New Evidence Emerges: After Zola’s J’Accuse and other revelations, the French government was forced to reconsider the case. In 1899, Dreyfus was brought back to France from Devil’s Island for a retrial. Although the military tribunal once again found him guilty, the evidence of his innocence was overwhelming, and public opinion began to shift in his favor.
Pardon and Final Exoneration: In 1899, President Emile Loubet granted Dreyfus a pardon, allowing him to go free, though this was not an official acknowledgment of his innocence. Dreyfus continued to fight to clear his name fully, and in 1906, after further investigation, the French Supreme Court overturned his conviction. Dreyfus was officially exonerated and reinstated in the army, eventually being promoted to the rank of major.
Aftermath and Legacy
Political and Social Consequences:
Impact on French Society: The Dreyfus Affair exposed deep-seated divisions in French society, particularly regarding issues of nationalism, the role of the military, the influence of the Catholic Church, and the treatment of Jews. The affair also highlighted the power of the press and public opinion in shaping political outcomes. The Dreyfus Affair became a defining moment in the struggle between republicanism and authoritarianism in France.
Rise of Anti-Semitism: The Dreyfus Affair also brought anti-Semitism to the forefront of public discourse in France. Many Anti-Dreyfusards used the case as an opportunity to promote anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, portraying Jews as traitors and a threat to the French nation. The affair inspired the growth of the Action Française, an extreme nationalist and anti-Semitic political movement.
Zionist Movement: The Dreyfus Affair had a significant impact on Theodor Herzl, an Austrian journalist who covered the affair and became convinced that anti-Semitism could not be eradicated in Europe. Herzl later founded the modern Zionist movement, advocating for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in response to widespread anti-Semitism.
Dreyfus’s Later Life
Return to the Army: After his exoneration, Dreyfus rejoined the French army. During World War I, he served honorably, though he largely avoided the spotlight. Dreyfus lived out the rest of his life quietly and died in 1935. Although his name was eventually cleared, the scars of the Dreyfus Affair continued to affect French society for years to come.
Long-Term Legacy
Republicanism and the Separation of Church and State: The Dreyfus Affair strengthened the position of the French republic and the ideals of secularism and equality before the law. In 1905, France enacted the Law on the Separation of the Churches and the State, which established the principle of laïcité (secularism) and curtailed the influence of the Catholic Church in public affairs.
Symbol of Justice and Human Rights: The Dreyfus Affair has become a symbol of the fight for justice, human rights, and the rule of law. It is frequently cited as an example of the dangers of prejudice, scapegoating, and the abuse of power by state institutions. The affair also demonstrated the importance of a free press and intellectual activism in challenging injustice.
- Home
- /
- Regions
- /
- Europe
- /
- France
- /
- Historical Events in France
- /
- Dreyfus affair
Advertisement:
- Audible Audiobook
- Piers Paul Read (Author) - David Pevsner (Narrator)
- English (Publication Language)
- Amazon Kindle Edition
- Harris, Ruth (Author)
- English (Publication Language)
- Used Book in Good Condition
- Bredin, Jean-Denis (Author)
- English (Publication Language)
- Ruth Harris (Author)
- English (Publication Language)
- 560 Pages - 03/24/2025 (Publication Date) - Penguin Books (Publisher)
- Zola, Emile (Author)
- English (Publication Language)
- 244 Pages - 02/17/1998 (Publication Date) - Yale University Press (Publisher)
- Amazon Kindle Edition
- Burns, Michael (Author)
- English (Publication Language)
We get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
- Home
- /
- Regions
- /
- Europe
- /
- France
- /
- Historical Events in France
- /
- Dreyfus affair
Comments