Pentagon Papers

The Pentagon Papers refers to a top-secret U.S. Department of Defense study on the political and military involvement of the United States in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. The report was officially titled “United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense”, but it became widely known as the Pentagon Papers when portions of it were leaked to the press in 1971 by Daniel Ellsberg, a former military analyst. The leak exposed significant government deception regarding the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, sparking widespread public outrage and raising major legal and constitutional issues concerning freedom of the press.

Background
U.S. Involvement in Vietnam
The United States became increasingly involved in Vietnam after World War II, initially providing support to the French colonial government in its fight against the communist-led Viet Minh forces. After France’s defeat in 1954, the U.S. took on a more direct role in supporting the non-communist South Vietnamese government as part of its Cold War strategy to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia (the domino theory).

By the early 1960s, U.S. involvement had escalated, culminating in the Vietnam War, which became a deeply divisive conflict both in the U.S. and around the world. U.S. leaders publicly expressed confidence in the war effort while privately harboring doubts about its success and the reasons for continued escalation.

The Pentagon Papers: Commissioning and Content
In 1967, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara commissioned a study to examine U.S. involvement in Vietnam. McNamara, who was beginning to have doubts about the war, wanted a thorough historical record of the decisions that had led to the current situation. The study, conducted by a team of military analysts and historians, was a 7,000-page, 47-volume report that provided a detailed account of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, dating back to the Truman administration.

Key Findings:
The report contained several revelations that contradicted the official public narrative provided by successive U.S. administrations:

Presidential Deception: The Pentagon Papers revealed that several U.S. presidents, including Harry Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson, had consistently misled the public and Congress about the nature and scope of U.S. involvement in Vietnam.

Escalation of the War: The report showed that U.S. military actions, including bombing campaigns, were planned and executed without the knowledge of the American public or Congress. It also detailed how the Johnson administration had made decisions to escalate the war, despite internal government doubts about the likelihood of victory.

Dubious Motives: The report documented that U.S. involvement in Vietnam was driven less by concerns about the welfare of the Vietnamese people or democratic ideals and more by geopolitical interests, including the containment of communism, and concerns about U.S. credibility in the world.

Contradictions in Policy: Despite public assurances that victory in Vietnam was achievable, the report revealed that U.S. officials privately acknowledged the war was unwinnable and that further escalation would lead to more casualties without significant progress.

The Leak: Daniel Ellsberg and the New York Times (1971)
Daniel Ellsberg’s Role
Daniel Ellsberg, who had worked as a military analyst for the RAND Corporation, had access to the Pentagon Papers while assisting in the study. Initially a supporter of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, Ellsberg became disillusioned as he witnessed the ongoing carnage and deception. In 1971, convinced that the American public had a right to know the truth about the war, Ellsberg secretly copied the report.

The New York Times and Legal Battle
In June 1971, Ellsberg leaked portions of the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times, which began publishing excerpts on June 13, 1971. The first article exposed the widespread deception by successive U.S. administrations regarding the scope of U.S. military action and political involvement in Vietnam.

The Nixon administration, which was in office at the time of the leak, immediately sought to prevent further publication of the Pentagon Papers. The administration obtained a court injunction to halt The New York Times’ publication on the grounds that the leaks constituted a national security breach.

Supreme Court Decision:
The legal battle quickly escalated, with the Washington Post and other newspapers also obtaining copies of the Pentagon Papers and publishing excerpts. The case culminated in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, New York Times Co. v. United States (1971). In a 6-3 ruling, the Court upheld the right of the press to publish the Pentagon Papers, arguing that prior restraint (government censorship before publication) violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press.

Impact and Aftermath
Public Reaction:
The release of the Pentagon Papers fueled growing public distrust of the U.S. government, particularly regarding the Vietnam War. Many Americans felt betrayed by the revelations that their leaders had repeatedly lied about the nature of the conflict, its origins, and the likelihood of success.

The leak also intensified the anti-war movement, which had already been gaining momentum during the late 1960s. Protests, demonstrations, and public opposition to the war escalated in the years following the publication of the Pentagon Papers.

Political Consequences:
While the Nixon administration was not directly implicated in the Pentagon Papers (as the report covered events before Nixon took office), Nixon and his advisors viewed the leak as a dangerous precedent. They feared that more sensitive information could be leaked, potentially damaging their efforts to conduct the war and other foreign policy initiatives.

The administration’s aggressive response to the leak, including efforts to discredit Ellsberg, eventually led to the formation of the “White House Plumbers”, a covert group tasked with preventing future leaks and investigating those responsible for the Pentagon Papers. The Plumbers would later be involved in the infamous Watergate break-in in 1972, which ultimately led to Nixon’s resignation in 1974.

Daniel Ellsberg’s Trial:
Daniel Ellsberg was charged with espionage, theft, and conspiracy under the Espionage Act of 1917, facing up to 115 years in prison. However, in 1973, his trial was dismissed after it was revealed that the Nixon administration had engaged in illegal wiretapping and burglarized Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s office in an attempt to find damaging information about him. This misconduct led to the collapse of the case against him.

Legacy of the Pentagon Papers
Freedom of the Press: The Pentagon Papers case set an important precedent for freedom of the press in the United States. The Supreme Court’s ruling reinforced the idea that the government could not use prior restraint to censor the media, even in cases involving classified information, unless there was a direct and immediate threat to national security.

Public Accountability: The publication of the Pentagon Papers highlighted the importance of government transparency and public accountability. It exposed the dangers of excessive government secrecy, particularly in matters of war and foreign policy, and became a rallying cry for those demanding more openness from their leaders.

Impact on the Vietnam War: The revelations in the Pentagon Papers further eroded public support for the Vietnam War and increased pressure on the U.S. government to withdraw. While the war continued until 1975, the Pentagon Papers contributed to the growing realization that U.S. involvement in Vietnam had been deeply flawed.

Whistleblowing: The Pentagon Papers leak made Daniel Ellsberg one of the most famous whistleblowers in history, inspiring future whistleblowers who would expose government wrongdoing, including Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning.

Advertisement:

We get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.