Virginia Peace Conference (1861)

The Virginia Peace Conference of 1861 was a last-ditch effort to avert the impending American Civil War by seeking a…

By Staff , in Historical Events in the USA , at October 28, 2024 Tags: 1861, usa

Find Cheap Textbooks - Save on New & Used Textbooks at AbeBooks.com

The Virginia Peace Conference of 1861 was a last-ditch effort to avert the impending American Civil War by seeking a compromise between Northern and Southern states on the contentious issue of slavery. Organized by the state of Virginia, the conference convened in Washington, D.C., from February 4 to February 27, 1861. It brought together representatives from 21 of the 34 states to negotiate a solution, but it ultimately failed to produce an agreement that could satisfy both sides. While the conference did create a proposed compromise, it was unable to prevent the secession of additional Southern states or the onset of the Civil War.

Background and Context
Growing Tensions over Slavery: By 1860, tensions between the North and South had reached a boiling point, primarily over slavery’s expansion into new territories and states. The election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 heightened these tensions, as Lincoln and the Republican Party opposed the expansion of slavery. Fearing that Lincoln’s presidency would threaten the institution of slavery, Southern states began to secede from the Union, starting with South Carolina in December 1860.

Virginia’s Effort to Mediate: As secession continued, Virginia, a border state with both Northern and Southern ties, attempted to find a compromise. Virginia leaders, hoping to prevent further secession and avoid war, called for a conference of states to explore peaceful solutions. They aimed to broker a compromise that could maintain the Union and address Southern concerns about slavery.

Meeting Date and Overlap with the Confederate Convention: The Virginia Peace Conference opened on February 4, 1861, the same day as the Montgomery Convention, where representatives from seceded Southern states met to establish the Confederate States of America. This overlap meant that Southern delegates with secessionist views were absent from the Peace Conference, weakening its ability to influence states that had already chosen to secede.

The Delegates and Leadership
The Virginia Peace Conference gathered 131 delegates from 21 states, mostly Northern and border states, as several Deep South states had already seceded and did not attend. Former President John Tyler, a Virginian and former Southern slaveholder, was chosen to preside over the conference.

Representation from Border and Northern States: While all Northern and border states sent delegates, prominent Southern states that had already seceded, including South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida, did not participate. This limited the potential for compromise, as these states were key stakeholders in the Southern cause.

Diverse Interests: The delegates included prominent political figures from both parties, as well as representatives with differing views on slavery. However, the absence of states that had already seceded meant the conference was largely attended by moderate representatives from states with mixed allegiances.

The Proposed Compromise
The conference’s primary goal was to create a plan that could serve as a constitutional amendment to address Southern grievances. The proposal was heavily influenced by the earlier Crittenden Compromise (proposed by Senator John J. Crittenden), which sought to protect slavery in the territories below the Missouri Compromise line (36°30′ latitude).

Key Provisions of the Proposal: The compromise proposed by the Virginia Peace Conference included the following measures:
Protection of Slavery in Existing Slave States: The proposal reaffirmed that slavery would remain protected in states where it already existed.
Extension of the Missouri Compromise Line: The compromise proposed extending the Missouri Compromise line westward to the Pacific, allowing slavery in new territories south of this line and prohibiting it north of the line.
Protection of Fugitive Slave Laws: The proposal called for stricter enforcement of fugitive slave laws, ensuring that escaped slaves who reached Northern states would be returned to their owners.
Limited Changes to Existing Law: Unlike more drastic compromises, the proposal did not call for substantial changes to federal law or attempt to abolish slavery in any region outright, as this would have been unacceptable to Southern interests.

Outcome and Failure of the Conference
Lack of Congressional Support: After nearly a month of deliberations, the conference presented its proposed amendments to Congress on February 27, 1861. However, the proposal failed to gain significant support in the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives, as it faced opposition from both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions.

Republican Opposition: Many Northern Republicans, particularly those aligned with President Lincoln, opposed any extension of slavery into new territories, as they believed that it would strengthen the institution of slavery and contradict their anti-slavery platform.
Southern Secessionists’ Opposition: Southern states that had already seceded, along with pro-secession elements in other states, viewed the proposal as insufficient. They felt it failed to address the fundamental right to expand slavery freely into new territories and protect slavery from federal interference.
Lincoln’s Limited Engagement: President-elect Abraham Lincoln, who was in Washington preparing for his inauguration, refrained from participating directly in the conference. Although he reportedly supported efforts to maintain the Union, he was firm in his opposition to the spread of slavery. Lincoln’s lack of endorsement weakened the proposal’s appeal among Republicans in Congress.

Ineffectiveness in Preventing Secession: By the time the conference concluded, seven Southern states had already seceded, and efforts to pass the proposal failed. The remaining Southern states were not swayed by the compromise, and in April 1861, the attack on Fort Sumter marked the beginning of the Civil War.

Legacy and Historical Significance
The Virginia Peace Conference of 1861 is often seen as a missed opportunity to prevent the Civil War, though historians debate whether any compromise could have effectively resolved the sectional tensions over slavery at that time.

Symbol of Last Efforts at Compromise: The conference represents the final significant attempt to find a peaceful solution to the Union’s growing divide. It illustrates the lengths to which moderate politicians went to avoid conflict, even as secessionists and abolitionists moved toward more polarized positions.

Testament to Sectional Divide: The failure of the Virginia Peace Conference highlighted the depth of the divide between the North and the South, as well as the limitations of compromise when core values and economic interests were at stake. The conference’s failure demonstrated that the issues of slavery and state sovereignty had become irreconcilable.

Influence on Border States: Although it failed to prevent the Civil War, the conference’s moderate approach may have influenced the decisions of some border states, such as Virginia, Kentucky, and Missouri, to initially attempt neutrality or remain in the Union.

Historical Reflection on Compromise: The conference is remembered as part of a series of compromises, including the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, which had previously delayed disunion. By 1861, however, it became clear that such compromises could no longer address the fundamental conflict over slavery in a way that satisfied both sides.